Expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and bone morphogenetic protein-4 in Skeletal Class Ⅱ Malocclusion during growth peak / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND:Preliminary studies of our research group have confirmed that bone morphogenetic protein-4 can stimulate the development of mandible in the growth period, but whether bone morphogenetic protein-4 can interact with bone morphogenetic protein-2 to promote the growth of mandible has not been reported. OBJECTIVE:To detect the expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and bone morphogenetic protein-4 in skeletal class II malocclusion during growth peak, and to explore the relationship of the expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and bone morphogenetic protein-4 with mandibular growth. METHODS: Patients with skeletal class I malocclusion in growth peak served as group I, and those with skeletal class II malocclusion in growth peak characterized as mandibular retrognathia acted as group II. There were 18 cases in each group. Expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and bone morphogenetic protein-4 in serum was detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The mRNA expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and bone morphogenetic protein-4 in the group II was significantly lower than that in the group I (P < 0.05). In the group II, there was a significant correlation between the expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and bone morphogenetic protein-4. These experimental findings confirm that the reduced expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and bone morphogenetic protein-4 in skeletal class II malocclusion during growth peak has a certain relationship with mandibular deficiency, and moreover, bone morphogenetic protein-2 interacts with bone morphogenetic protein-4 to promote the growth of mandible.

Vertical facial types and chin morphology effects on the facial profile attractiveness / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND:Individuals with different vertical facial types have different chin morphologies. For the individuals with different vertical facial types, what is the most beautiful chin morphology? OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effects of vertical facial types and chin morphology on facial profile attractiveness. METHODS:Three beautiful females were selected, including one with high mandibular angle, one with average angle and one with low angle. Their facial profile photographs were taken. A series of new pictures were generated by the smal scale (2 mm per unit) modification of soft tissue chin in the sagittal direction and vertical direction. Raters consisting of 17 orthodontists and 35 laypersons were selected for aesthetic ratings, in order to evaluate the facial profile attractiveness of the individuals with different vertical facial types. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:There was no esthetic difference of vertical change in female with high angle;while slightly protrude chin was perceived to be more beautiful than retruded chin. For the female with average angle, lower chin was more attractive than higher chin;slightly protruded chin was beautiful than excessive protruded chin and retruded chin. For the individual with low angle, higher chin was preferred by raters;slightly protruded chin was more beautiful than excessive protruded chin and retruded chin.The results indicate that the effects of vertical facial types and chin morphology to facial profile attractiveness are different. In clinical orthodontic, vertical facial types should be taking into consideration to change the chin morphology of the patents, in order to obtain better profile attractiveness.